Please try again, the name must be unique Only letters and numbers accepted. Issue Follow comments Enter your email to follow new comments on this article. Would you favor or oppose a constitutional amendment that would define marriage as being between a man and a woman, thus barring marriages between gay or lesbian couples?
The member committee included experts from the fields of mental health, biostatistics, clinical medicine, adolescent health and development, aging, parenting, behavioral sciences, HIV research, demography, racial and ethnic disparities, and health services research.
CNN interactive. Kempner J. Retrieved 4 August These are external links and will open in a new window. Given the lack of data on the LGBT population in national and administrative a gay in public or not comfortable in public areas, an online survey was considered the best way to access a large number of respondents.
Historical context— A historical perspective provides a context for understanding the forces and factors that have shaped an individual's experiences; those born within the same historical period may experience events differently from those born earlier or later.
Journal of Homosexuality. Janet Street-Porter. The chilling effect: How do researchers react to controversy? Siker An intersectional perspective is useful because it acknowledges simultaneous dimensions of inequality and focuses on understanding how they are interrelated and how they shape and influence one another.
The most insightful comments on all subjects will be published daily in dedicated articles. Do you think there should or should not be -- Health insurance and other employee benefits for gay and lesbian domestic partners or spouses? In addition, respondents had to be willing to self-identify as LGBT; these people may have a different experience to those who are unwilling to identify in this way, even in an anonymous survey.
March 1, The survey received over , valid responses, making it the largest national survey to date of LGBT people anywhere in the world. Each complements the others to yield a more comprehensive approach to understanding lived experiences and their impact on LGBT health.